Today’s top readings
The ten names on the watchlist with the most higher-timeframe trend agreement right now, each drawn as a thumbprint of its five published readings.
Educational and entertainment statistics only. Not investment advice. This is a research model showing its work, for learning and paper trading. It does not know you or your situation, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.
How to read this
The order is trend agreement, not the score. Cards are ranked by how many higher-timeframe trend pairs currently point the same way — the x/4 figure on each card. That is a description of where things stand right now, and nothing more.
We deliberately do not rank by the model’s confidence score, even though it is shown on every card. The score is entangled with how far a setup has to travel before we would call it a win, so sorting by it would rank setups by target distance rather than by quality. The method note explains how we found that out, and what we withdrew because of it.
The thumbprint is the same five numbers as the bars beside it, drawn as a shape so you can compare cards at a glance instead of reading ten sets of percentages. Each spoke is one reading; a bigger outline means several readings are currently high. Similar shapes mean similar readings. Colour follows the shape, not a good-to-bad scale — there is no green-means-buy here, because that would assert exactly the claim we cannot support. A missing reading is drawn as zero rather than assumed healthy.
Read a score next to its trend spread, never alone. The spread is roughly how far the setup would need to move to count as a win, and it rises with the score.
The list follows the watchlist: when names are added or removed upstream, the cards here swap on the next refresh. Everything is the free feed, delayed 15 minutes, and pauses outside market hours. The full board shows every name including the refusals.